Monday, December 28, 2009

Imam Hussain -Views of Non-Muslim Scholars

Imam Hussain -Views of Non-Muslim Scholars

The event of Karbala marks the greatest sacrifice for the sake of God in the human history. The minute and stunning details of this great event have been written and survived from the very first day by the eye witnesses. For the last fourteen hundred centuries, the battle of Karbala reflects the collision of the good versus the evil, the virtuous versus the wicked, right versus the wrong, and the collision of Imam Husain (the head of virtue) versus Yazid (the head of impiety).
Edward G. Brown, the professor of Arabic and oriental studies at the University of Cambridge, praises Imam Husain in these words:
"… a reminder of the blood-stained field of Kerbela, where the grandson of the Apostle of God fell at length, tortured by thirst and surrounded by the bodies of his murdered kinsmen, has been at anytime since then sufficient to evoke, even in the most lukewarm and heedless, the deepest emotions, the most frantic grief, and an exaltation of spirit before which pain, danger and death shrink to unconsidered trifles."
[A Literary History of Persia, London, 1919, p. 227]
As the Imam of the time and true representative of his grandfather Prophet Muhammad (S), Imam Husain (A) stood up against the tyrant of the time to safeguard and protect Islam and guide fellow Muslims. On the other hand, the staying power of the rulers (Mu'awiya and his son Yazid) depended solely on the might of the sword. They used brute force to rule over the Muslim empire even by all possible illicit means.
By the time the sun was set, the day of Ashura in the plains of Karbala, witnessed Imam Husain (A) giving up everything humanly possible in the way of God including his 72 brave and loyal followers and his 6 months beautiful baby, Ali Asghar. In the wake of such a great sacrifices, the Quran praises as:
“Think not of those who are slain in God's way as dead. Nay, they are living, finding their sustenance in the presence of their Lord” (Qur'an 3:169).
Before the battle of Karbala, the world knew only the rule that “The Might is the Right”. However, the day of Assura introduced even more powerful rule to this world; “The Right is the Might” . Now, the blood of the innocent could win over the sword of a tyrant.
Mahatma Gandhi (Indian political and spiritual leader) writes: “I learned from Hussein how to achieve victory while being oppressed.”
According to the great poet Rabindranath Tagore, Hussain’s sacrifice indicates spiritual liberation. He writes: “In order to keep alive justice and truth, instead of an army or weapons, success can be achieved by sacrificing lives, exactly what Imam Hussain (A.S.) did”
Such an everlasting victory can only be achieved by the one who totally believes and trust in the Almighty God.
Thomas Carlyle (Scottish historian and essayist) explains: “The best lesson which we get from the tragedy of Karbala is that Husain and his companions were rigid believers in God. They illustrated that the numerical superiority does not count when it comes to the truth and the falsehood. The victory of Husain, despite his minority, marvels me!”
Imam Hussain (A.S.) explains the mission of his sacrifice in his own words: “I have taken this stand not out of arrogance or pride, neither out of mischief or injustice. I have risen to seek reform in the community of my grandfather. I would like to bid good, forbid evil, and follow the tradition of my grandfather and my father ‘Ali bin Abi Talib.”
Charles Dickens (English novelist) writes: “If Husain had fought to quench his worldly desires…then I do not understand why his sister, wife, and children accompanied him. It stands to reason therefore, that he sacrificed purely for Islam.”
In spite of all the painful aspects of Karbala, it holds a great significance in the Islamic history, for the revolution of Imam Husain (A) was not merely an event which had taken place by chance. It was rather a movement for the revival of Islam. Imam Hussain (A) declared his noble mission right from the day one.
Antoine Bara (Lebanese writer) writes: “No battle in the modern and past history of mankind has earned more sympathy and admiration as well as provided more lessons than the martyrdom of Husayn in the battle of Karbala.” (Husayn in Christian Ideology)
History has seen numerous massacres of innocent people, but the tragedy of Karbala is one of the few where men, women and children voluntarily allowed themselves to be subjected to hunger, thirst, humiliation and death on the burning sands of Karbala because they believed that Imam Hussain (A) stood for righteousness. Little wonder that for over 1400 years Muslims, have been nurturing the tale of Karbala in their hearts like an open wound, lest they should forget the supreme sacrifice of Imam Hussain (A) and his followers.
Great spiritual leaders are known to make great sacrifices, but at Karbala, common men and women with infants at their bosom, their hearts and souls aflame with righteousness, chose death rather than evil and weakness. Such was the greatness of Imam Hussain (A); such was his spiritual power, which could uplift common mortals to heights of supreme courage and sacrifice.
Dr. K. Sheldrake writes: “Of that gallant band, male and female knew that the enemy forces around were implacable, and were not only ready to fight, but to kill. Denied even water for the children, they remained parched under the burning sun and scorching sands, yet not one faltered for a moment. Husain marched with his little company, not to glory, not to power of wealth, but to a supreme sacrifice, and every member bravely faced the greatest odds without flinching.”
Dr. Radha Krishnan writes “Though Imam Hussain gave his life years ago, but his indestructible soul rules the hearts of people even today.”
The tragedy of Karbala took place in 680 AD on the banks of the Euphrates in Iraq but Karbala has a universal appeal and in today’s climate of violence, it is more relevant than ever. The tragedy of Karbala and its spirit of non-violent resistance and supreme sacrifice has been a source of inspiration to the likes of Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru.
Mahatma Gandhi’s first Salt Satyagrah was inspired by Imam Hussain’s non violent resistance to the tyranny of Yazid. Gandhi is said to have studied the history of Islam and Imam Hussain (A), and was of the opinion that Islam represented not the legacy of a sword but of sacrifices of saints like Imam Hussain (A).
Mahatma Gandhi writes:“My faith is that the progress of Islam does not depend on the use of sword by its believers, but the result of the supreme sacrifice of Hussain (A), the great saint.”
Nehru considered Karbala to represent humanities strength and determination. He writes:
“Imam Hussain’s (A) sacrifice is for all groups and communities, an example of the path of righteousness.”
Dr. Rajendra Prasad writes, “The sacrifice of Imam Hussain (A) is not limited to one country, or nation, but it is the hereditary state of the brotherhood of all mankind.”
Dr. Radha Krishnan writes, “Though Imam Hussain (A) gave his life almost 1300 years ago, but his indestructible soul rules the hearts of people even today.”
Swami Shankaracharya describes, “It is Hussain’s (A) sacrifice that has kept Islam alive or else in this world there would be no one left to take Islam’s name.”
Mrs. Sarojini Naidu writes, “I congratulate Muslims that from among them, Hussain (A), a great human being was born, who is reverted and honored totally by all communities”
Simon Ockley (1678-1720), the Professor of Arabic at the University of Cambridge writes:
"Then Husain mounted his horse, and took the Koran and laid it before him, and, coming up to the people, invited them to the performances of their duty: adding, 'O God, thou art my confidence in every trouble, and my hope in all adversity!'… He next reminded them of his excellencies, the nobility of his birth, the greatness of his power, and his high descent, and said, 'Consider with yourselves whether or not such a man as I am is not better than you; I who am the son of your prophet's daughter, besides whom there is no other upon the face of the earth. Ali was my father; Jaafar and Hamza, the chief of the martyrs, were both my uncles; and the apostle of God, upon whom be peace, said both of me and my brother, that we were the chief of the youth of paradise. If you will believe me, what I say is true, for by God, I never told a lie in earnest since I had my understanding; for God hates a lie. If you do not believe me, ask the companions of the apostle of God [here he named them], and they will tell you the same. Let me go back to what I have.' They asked, 'What hindered him from being ruled by the rest of his relations.' He answered, 'God forbid that I should set my hand to the resignation of my right after a slavish manner. I have recourse to God from every tyrant that doth not believe in the day of account.'"
[The History of the Saracens, London, 1894, pp. 404-5]
Ignaz Goldziher (1850-1921), the Famous Hungarian orientalist scholar writes:
"Ever since the black day of Karbala, the history of this family … has been a continuous series of sufferings and persecutions. These are narrated in poetry and prose, in a richly cultivated literature of martyrologies - a Shi'i specialty - and form the theme of Shi'i gatherings in the first third of the month of Muharram, whose tenth day ('ashura) is kept as the anniversary of the tragedy at Karbala. Scenes of that tragedy are also presented on this
day of commemoration in dramatic form (ta'ziya). 'Our feast days are our assemblies of mourning.' So concludes a poem by a prince of Shi'i disposition recalling the many mihan of the Prophet's family. Weeping and lamentation over the evils and persecutions suffered by the 'Alid family, and mourning for its martyrs: these are things from which loyal supporters of the cause cannot cease. 'More touching than the tears of the Shi'is' has even become an Arabic proverb."
[Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law, Princeton, 1981, p. 179]
Edward Gibbon (1737-1794), considered as the greatest British historian of his time writes
"In a distant age and climate the tragic scene of the death of Husain will awaken the sympathy of the coldest reader."
[The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, London, 1911, volume 5, pp. 391-2]
Peter J. Chelkowski, Professor of Middle Eastern Studies, New York University, writes
"Hussein accepted and set out from Mecca with his family and an entourage of about seventy followers. But on the plain of Kerbela they were caught in an ambush set by the … caliph, Yazid. Though defeat was certain, Hussein refused to pay homage to him. Surrounded by a great enemy force, Hussein and his company existed without water for ten days in the burning desert of Kerbela. Finally Hussein, the adults and some male children of his family and his companions were cut to bits by the arrows and swords of Yazid's army; his women and remaining children were taken as captives to Yazid in Damascus. The renowned historian Abu Reyhan al-Biruni states; "… then fire was set to their camp and the bodies were trampled by the hoofs of the horses; nobody in the history of the human kind has seen such atrocities."
[Ta'ziyeh: Ritual and Drama in Iran, New York, 1979, p. 2]
Reynold Alleyne Nicholson(1868-1945), Sir Thomas Adams Professor of Arabic at the University of Cambridge, writes, "Husayn fell, pierced by an arrow, and his brave followers were cut down beside him to the last man. Muhammadan tradition, which with rare exceptions is uniformly hostile to the Umayyad dynasty, regards Husayn as a martyr and Yazid as his murderer."
[A Literary History of the Arabs, Cambridge, 1930, p. 197 ]
Robert Durey Osborn (1835-1889), the Major of the Bengal Staff Corps, writes, "Hosain had a child named Abdallah, only a year old. He had accompanied his father in this terrible march. Touched by its cries, he took the infant in his arms and wept. At that instant, a shaft from the hostile ranks pierced the child's ear, and it expired in his father's arms. Hosain placed the little corpse upon the ground. 'We come from God, and we return to Him!' he cried; 'O Lord, give me strength to bear these misfortunes!' … Faint with thirst, and exhausted with wounds, he fought with desperate courage, slaying several of his antagonists. At last he was cut down from behind; at the same instance a lance was thrust through his back and bore him to the ground; as the dealer of this last blow withdrew his weapon, the ill-fated son of Ali rolled over a corpse. The head was severed from the trunk; the trunk was trampled under the hoofs of the victors' horses; and the next morning the women and a surviving infant son were carried away to Koufa. The bodies of Hosain and his followers were left unburied on the spot where they fell. For three days they remained exposed to the sun and the night dews, the vultures and the prowling animals of the waste; but then the inhabitants of a neighboring village, struck with horror that the body of a
grandson of the Prophet should be thus shamefully abandoned to the unclean beasts of the field, dared the anger of Obaidallah, and interred the body of the martyr and those of his heroic friends.”
[Islam Under the Arabs, Delaware, 1976, pp. 126-7]
Sir William Muir (1819-1905), the Scottish scholar and statesman and held the post of Foreign Secretary to the Indian government as well as Lieutenant Governor of the Northwestern Provinces writes: "The tragedy of Karbala decided not only the fate of the caliphate, but of the Mohammedan kingdoms long after the Caliphate had waned and disappeared."
[Annals of the Early Caliphate, London, 1883, pp. 441-2]
Karbala symbolizes the true face of struggle against injustice – non-violent resistance. Not taking life but sacrificing your life for Islam. In summary, it is not out of place to say in words of some known Indian poets:
  • Let humanity awaken and every tribe will claim Hussain as their own.
  • In the martyr of Imam Hussain A.S.), lies the death of Yazid, for Islam resurrects after every Karbala
Source

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Commentary

Hussain, the man who inspired Barack Obama's middle name, has inspired people from Ghandi, to Martin Luther King, to Edward Gibbon. He will never be forgotten by history.

He came to the help of his fellow countrymen who called out to him from Kufa, and yet he died because he refused to give "Bayat" or allegiance to the King of the time named Yazid.

For this he sacrificed everything but what mattered most, His Morals, beliefs, and Principals.

Would such men be alive today they would stuggle through the oppressors and stop at nothing until they achieved victory.

May this Hussain, peace be upon him, grandson of the Prophet of Islam, always be cherished and remembered for standing by his principles and being a shining emblem for Sincerity and Honor.

Thank you for your sacrifice, we will never forget it son of the Lion of God; as his Father Ali was called; may peace be upon all of them.

Iranian protests spark fresh clashes in Tehran

Iranian protests spark fresh clashes in Tehran

Protester in Iran
Images from Tehran showed police motorcycles being set alight

Clashes have taken place overnight in the Iranian capital, Tehran, following anti-government protests on Sunday in which at least eight people died.

Reports say police fired tear gas to disperse crowds of demonstrators in various parts of the city overnight.

The nephew of opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi was among those killed in Sunday's clashes, the worst violence since June's contested elections.

His funeral on Monday is thought likely to be a focal point for more protests.

According to Mr Mousavi's website, Seyed Ali Mousavi was shot in the back as security forces fired on demonstrators.

On Monday, Iranian state television said 15 people had been killed in the confrontation between the opposition and the security forces - though a different state media outlet later said eight people had died.

Police denied being responsible for any of the deaths. They said three were accidents and that one person had been shot, but not by police. Details of the others have not been given.

Officials said the shooting was under investigation.

Opposition politician Ebrahim Yazdi, a foreign minister after the 1979 revolution and now leader of the Freedom Movement of Iran, was also arrested early on Monday, according to the reformist website Jaras.

The protests, which began after President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's controversial re-election in June, have grown into the biggest challenge to the government since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

Media ban

About 300 people were detained after Sunday's protests, police said.

Those arrested include members of the banned opposition group Mujahideen Khalq Organisation (MKO) - or the People's Mujahideen - Iranian state-owned channel Press TV reported.

Why is such a holy day not respected by the rulers?
Mehdi Karoubi
Moderate cleric

The report quoted a source within the Iranian intelligence ministry.

Opposition supporters took to the streets on Sunday as the Shia Muslim festival of Ashura reached its climax.

Tehran's police chief, Azizollah Rajabzadeh, was among dozens of security force members injured in the clashes, officials said.

Unconfirmed reports said four people also died in protests in the north-western city of Tabriz and there were clashes in Isfahan and Najafabad in central Iran and Shiraz in the south.

Foreign media face severe restrictions in Iran and reports cannot be verified. However, witnesses said that in Tehran some protesters attacked police.

Police responded by firing directly into the crowds, opposition sources say, although this is denied by Iranian authorities.

Injured Iranian police officers

Clashes continued throughout the day. In the early hours of Monday, opposition sources said a large crowd had also gathered near the offices of the state-run television and radio.

They said police were firing tear gas in an attempt to disperse them.

Moderate cleric Mehdi Karoubi, who came fourth in last June's election, criticised Iran's rulers for Sunday's violence, an opposition website reported.

"What has happened to this religious system that it orders the killing of innocent people during the holy day of Ashura?" the Jaras website reported him as saying.

"Why is such a holy day not respected by the rulers?"

Foreign concern

The White House condemned the "unjust suppression" of protests.

RECENT UNREST IN IRAN
19 Dec: Influential dissident cleric Grand Ayatollah Hoseyn Ali Montazeri dies aged 87
21 Dec: Tens of thousands attend his funeral in Qom; reports of clashes between opposition supporters and security forces
22 Dec: Further confrontations reported in Qom
23 Dec: More clashes reported in city of Isfahan as memorial is held
24 Dec: Iran reportedly bans further memorial services for Montazeri except in his birthplace and Qom
26 Dec: Clashes reported in central and northern Tehran
27 Dec: At least eight dead following anti-government protests in Tehran; 300 reported arrested

"Hope and history are on the side of those who peacefully seek their universal rights, and so is the United States," White House National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer said.

A spokesman for the French foreign ministry, Bernard Bolero, also condemned the violence.

"These people in the streets are just claiming more freedom, more democracy," he told the BBC. "The repression of the police forces is not acceptable."

Iranian security forces have been on alert since influential dissident cleric Grand Ayatollah Hoseyn Ali Montazeri died a week ago aged 87.

His funeral attracted tens of thousands of pro-reform supporters, many of whom shouted anti-government slogans.

BBC Tehran correspondent Jon Leyne, who is now based in London, says the opposition - denied the right to protest - chose the highly significant festival of Ashura when millions of Iranians traditionally take to the streets for ceremonies and parades.

Anger at last June's elections, won by incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, sparked mass protests in Tehran and other cities that led to thousands of arrests and some deaths.

Mr Mousavi and other opposition leaders have said the poll was rigged.

Source

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Riz Khan - Clock ticking on Development Goals - 24 Dec 2009





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Commentary

If we had stuck to the guidelines we made back in 2000, in 5 years there would be no poverty. What an astounding fact...
How shocking and how short a time to accomplish one of the greatest tasks the world has ever seen.

Yet we failed. It is my generations job to try again and force the political will back up to meet this challenge. People complain all the time about Climate change but global poverty is silent and more deadly in the long run because it strips our potential for a better world economically, morally, and politically.

Lets work to try and bring this problem to an end.

Friday, December 25, 2009

Dublin church abuse for more than 3 decades

More Irish bishops 'must quit'

Church candles
The Catholic church in Ireland has been rocked by the abuse scandal

The remaining Irish bishops named in a report which exposed how Catholic leaders concealed child abuse must resign, a victims group has said.

On Wednesday the Bishop of Kildare said he would stand down, which came after the resignation of the Bishop of Limerick.

Maeve Lewis, chief executive of the One in Four group, said the resignations of three more bishops are "inevitable."

She said they should go quickly to avoid more damage to abuse survivors.

The Murphy report into abuse in the Dublin Archdiocese found that members of the church hierarchy were often more concerned with the reputation of the church than protecting children.

The other senior clerics facing calls to stand down include:

• Martin Drennan - Auxiliary Bishop in Dublin from 1997 to 2005 and currently Bishop of Galway. After the report was published Bishop Drennan said he was comfortable with the findings as it "says nothing negative about me".

• Eamonn Walsh - Auxiliary Bishop in Dublin since 1990. Before that, he was secretary to the Archbishop of Dublin from 1985 and held key positions in the archdiocese for much of the period covered by the Murphy report.

• Ray Field, a qualified barrister and Auxiliary Bishop in Dublin since 1997. He was found not to have fully informed a parish priest about abuse concerns surrounding a colleague.

Power

Ms Lewis said it was "immensely distressing and insulting" to survivors to be forced to listen as "one bishop after another justifies his position and attempts to hold on to power until he is shamed into resigning".

Marie Collins, who was abused by one of the priests named in the Murphy report, said it was not good enough for the bishops to say they not been criticised for personally mishandling a case.

"The point was they were managing the diocese, they were in positions of power in the diocese and they did nothing to stop what was going on.

"Doing nothing was every bit as bad as mishandling something personally."

Meanwhile, the Irish Times has reported conflict between Bishop Eamonn Walsh and the current Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin.

Bishop Walsh has sent a letter to priests stating Archbishop Martin had expressed full confidence in his auxiliary bishops following the Murphy report.

However, a spokeswoman for the Archbishop has made it clear that he is still evaluating the report and has not expressed unconditional support for anyone.

Source

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bishop Donal Murray resignation: Q&A

Irish priest Dr Donal Murray has resigned as Bishop of Limerick.

BBC News Online examines how he came under increasing pressure in recent weeks for the way he dealt with a paedophile priest during his time as an auxiliary bishop in Dublin.

WHO IS HE?

Bishop Murray
Dr Donal Murray has resigned as Bishop of Limerick

Donal Murray was born in Dublin in 1940. He was ordained in 1966, having gained a doctorate in theology.

After an academic career which included lecturing in University College Dublin on Catechetics and medical ethics, he was appointed Auxiliary Bishop of Dublin in 1982.

At that time, he was the youngest member of the Irish Catholic hierarchy.

He was installed as Bishop of Limerick in March 1996.

WHY HAS HE RESIGNED?

A damning report into child abuse by priests in the Dublin archdiocese from 1975 to 2004 criticised the Catholic Church hierarchy there for a cover up.

The Report of the Commission of Investigation into the Catholic Archdiocese of Dublin, known as the Murphy report, laid bare a culture of concealment where church leaders prioritised the protection of their own institution above that of vulnerable children in their care.

Tom Naughton
Fr Tom Naughton was behind a litany of sex abuse

It found that during Dr Murray's time as an auxiliary bishop in Dublin from 1982 to 1996, he handled a number of complaints badly.

The report described his failure to investigate one allegation as "inexcusable".

For example, he did not deal properly with the suspicions and concerns that were expressed to him in relation to one priest, Fr Tom Naughton.

When, a short time later, factual evidence of Naughton's abusing emerged in another parish, it found Dr Murray's failure to reinvestigate the earlier suspicions was "inexcusable".

Parents who complained to Dr Murray about Naughton said he dismissed their concerns.

In May 1998, Naughton pleaded guilty to six counts of indecent assault on three boys. He was jailed for three years, reduced on appeal by six months.

On Wednesday, Naughton, now aged 78, was jailed for three years for abusing an altar boy between 1982 and 1984 in the parish of Valleymount in County Wicklow.

The judge said the "premeditated" abuse was "shocking and horrific". He said Naughton had taken advantage of his position of trust.

WHAT HAVE THOSE INVOLVED IN THE CASE BEEN SAYING?

Mervyn Rundle, who was abused by Naughton, has called for a criminal investigation into Dr Murray's response to the abuse allegations at the time.

"When are the guards (Irish police) going to act against these guys?" he told the Irish Times.

Retired Garda sergeant John Brennan, who sought to have Naughton removed from Valleymount in 1984 following complaints by parents, told the paper: "It was (Naughton's) superiors who, aware of this weakness, sent him around to other places, and I think they shouldn't be allowed at this stage to resign or retire.

"They should be the subject of a criminal investigation. If there is neglect and evidence of a cover-up, it shouldn't be a question of somebody resigning. They should be the subject of a criminal charge."

WHAT HAVE HIS COLLEAGUES BEEN SAYING?

A former doctoral student of Pope Benedict, Father Vincent Twomey, said it was a "scandal" that bishops criticised in the Murphy report had not resigned sooner.

Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin
Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin discussed the report with the Pope

Speaking on Sunday, the theologian, who is still close to the Pope, said delays in resignations were causing damage to the church.

Catholic Primate of all-Ireland Cardinal Sean Brady had stopped short of saying that Dr Murray should resign.

"Bishop Donal Murray has been in contact with me, as you know he is considering his position and hopes to be in a position to comment soon and I'm confident Bishop Donal will do the right thing," he said.

Current Archbishop of Dublin, Diarmuid Martin, told RTE: "If I am unhappy with answers... I don't want to be sitting at meetings with people who have not responded to a very serious situation.

"Everyone should stand up and take responsibility for what they did."

He has said that both Cardinal Brady and he were strongly convinced that the Irish Catholic hierarchy needs to re-establish strong leadership.

Bishop of Dromore John McAreavey said he believed Dr Murray had "serious questions to answer", adding that he believed he would resign if faced with a similar challenge to his "ability to deal with these matters with credibility and integrity".

However, Bishop Willie Walsh of Killaloe argued that calls for Dr Murray to resign were based on a misreading of the Murphy report and that a "public trial" was taking place, motivated by the desire by some to get "a head on a plate".

WHAT HAS DR MURRAY SAID FOLLOWING THE REPORT'S PUBLICATION?

Dr Murray said he was "acutely aware of the pain and anguish" experienced since the report was published and had begun engaging with the people and priests of his diocese about whether his ministry was a "hindrance or help".

In a letter read out during Masses on the weekend of 28/29 November, he said: "As I look back on that time, I ask myself many questions, especially about the three cases in which the report criticises me.

"At no time did I, as an auxiliary bishop of Dublin, receive an allegation of sexual abuse and fail to act.

"When an allegation of sexual abuse of children by a priest was brought to my attention, I responded promptly and conscientiously and in each case notified the Archbishop and Diocesan authorities and co-operated fully with them.

"I never deliberately or knowingly sought to cover up or withhold information brought to my attention.

"There were, as the report notes, occasions when roles/responsibilities were not clear or where I did not have full information concerning cases in which I was asked to become involved."

IS THE RESIGNATION OF A BISHOP UNPRECEDENTED?

In March, Bishop John Magee, the Newry, County Down-born Catholic Bishop of Cloyne, "stepped aside".

Bishop John Magee
Dr John Magee stepped aside as Bishop of Cloyne in March

Dr Magee faced many calls for resignation for failing to properly address allegations of clerical sex abuse within his County Cork diocese.

Technically, it was not a resignation, although in previous high-profile episcopal departures, there has been no doubt that a resignation was offered to the Pope.

Eamonn Casey resigned as Bishop of Galway in 1992 after an affair with an American divorcee, and Brendan Comiskey, then Bishop of Ferns, presented his resignation to the Vatican in 2002 following claims that he had mishandled allegations of child abuse by Fr Sean Fortune.

Source

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

More Info

Murphy_Report

To read about the investigation by the Police in Dublin, click here. Source Here.

1.10 The Commission examined complaints in respect of over 320 children against the 46 priests in the representative sample. Substantially more of the complaints relate to boys – the ratio is 2.3 boys to 1 girl.


1.11 Of the 46 priests examined, 11 pleaded guilty to or were convicted in the criminal courts of sexual assaults on children.


1.12 There is one clear case of a false accusation of child sexual abuse – Fr Ricardus*1 (see Chapter 55). There are two cases where there were suspicions or concerns but no actual complaint of child sexual abuse – Fr Guido* (see Chapter 51) and Fr Magnus* (see Chapter 49).
The priests – where they are now


1.13 Of the 46 priests in the representative sample, 11 are or were members of religious orders. Four of these are dead; four are living within their orders with restrictions on their ministry and activities; two are living within their orders without restrictions and one has become estranged from his order and is living without restriction in another diocese. One priest belongs to a UK diocese and his whereabouts are unknown. Of the 34 priests from the Dublin Archdiocese, ten are dead, 20 are out of ministry and four are in ministry. Of the 20 who are out of ministry, 11 are being financially supported by the Archdiocese and are living under restrictions imposed by Archbishop Martin; nine are laicised.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Commentary:

The honest truth is this: the belief that people can go their whole lives without a spouse and stay sexually inactive, is a joke and a fallacy of thought.

Celibacy can't even be called historical and from Divine thought because it's not concretely.

2 Facts that prove this:

  • 1) Catholics believe Peter was the first pope. This is undisputed, take it up with the pope or your priest if you didn't know this.
  • 2) Catholics claim Peter was Celibate. This is not the truth according to the following verse:
  • Matthey 8:14: "And when Jesus was come into Peter's house, he saw his wife's mother laid, and sick of a fever."

So the first pope was married?

Just show me where in Christianity it says people must be Celibate. The best it says is Celibacy is a gift that is given to certain people and should be honored by them; for those who don't have the gift, get married.

If the best Christians in the world never get married, and never have kids, that only leaves worse and worse Christians with worse and worse thoughts and ideas and perversions to remain.

Celibacy is a joke and is not Divine tradition as people would have you believe. Open up the good book and see for yourself. These scandals are a result of a bad tradition and a corruption of the true Christian beliefs Jesus stood for.

At best mandated Celibacy was ordained by the Catholic church, for whatever purposes they used it for, and it is nothing more than a MAN MADE tradition, not a DIVINE mandate.

The effects of this tradition have been seen here today. Celibacy is therefore immoral and leads to child abuse; something that no religion can condone or stand for. Thus Celibacy should be removed from the Catholic church as a mandate at the very least. Mandated Celibacy is wrong.





Molecules and synapses cement memories, say scientists

Molecules and synapses cement memories, say scientists

neurons
Neurons are core components of the brain, transmitting and processing data

US scientists believe they have uncovered one of the mechanisms that enables the brain to form memories.

Synapses - where brain cells connect with each other - have long been known to be the key site of information exchange and storage in the brain.

But researchers say they have now learnt how molecules at the site of the synapse behave to cement a memory.

It is hoped the research, published in Neuron, could aid the development of drugs for diseases like Alzheimer's.

The deteriorating health of the synapses is increasingly thought to be a feature of Alzheimer's, a disease in which short-term memory suffers before long-term recollections are affected.

Scientists have been perplexed for some time as to why, when synapses are strengthened, you have the degradation of proteins going on side by side with the synthesis of new proteins
Kenneth Kosik
University of California Santa Barbara

A strong synapse is needed for cementing a memory, and this process involves making new proteins. But how exactly the body controls this process has not been clear.

Now scientists at the University of California Santa Barbara say their laboratory work on rats shows the production of proteins needed to cement memories can only happen when the RNA - the collection of molecules that take genetic messages from the nucleus to the rest of the cell - is switched on.

Until it is required, the RNA is paralysed by a "silencing" molecule - which itself contains proteins.

When an external signal comes in - for example when one sees something interesting or has an unusual experience - the silencing molecule fragments and the RNA is released.

This interesting development could give a greater understanding of the memory loss experienced by people with Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia and lead to new treatments
Rebecca Wood
Alzheimer's Research Trust

Kenneth Kosik of the university's neuroscience research institute said: "One reason why this is interesting is that scientists have been perplexed for some time as to why, when synapses are strengthened, you have the degradation of proteins going on side by side with the synthesis of new proteins.

"So we have now resolved this paradox. We show that protein degradation and synthesis go hand in hand. The degradation permits the synthesis."

Identifying the proteins the brain needs in order to cement the memory could ultimately have benefits for those suffering from memory disorders.

Rebecca Wood, head of the Alzheimer's Research Trust, said: "Scientists say they have studied nerve cells in the laboratory and learnt more about how specific proteins may have a role in areas of the brain that transmit messages and help us store memories.

The health of synapses and their activity levels is becoming an important and interesting focus of research
Professor Julie Williams

"This interesting development could give a greater understanding of the memory loss experienced by people with Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia and lead to new treatments."

The most recent projections suggest 115 million people across the globe will suffer from dementia by 2050.

Julie Williams, professor of psychological medicine at Cardiff University, said: "Our increasing understanding of genetic risk factors in Alzheimer's is pointing to the synapses so any new study in this area is welcome.

"Alzheimer's is a complicated disease and it is early days, but the health of synapses and their activity levels is becoming an important and interesting focus of research."

Source

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Commentary

This goes along with my theory that I've held since 2008 that proteins are at the central core of every issue we have with the human body. They play a significant role in one way or another and will be integral in treating and curing patients; it's why I signed up for Biotech instead of regular simple molecule Pharma.

To get to the meat of the bones, we basically get everything from proteins because that's the one road route from DNA. DNA goes to mRNA which goes to Proteins, which makes everything else. That being the case, problems lie in 3 areas, the DNA, mRNA, and Proteins.

mRNA has a short lifespan and is enocoded fairly well so it doesn't have many problems and isn't the result of many mistakes. Proteins and DNA, on other hand, that's where we need to start.

We've been pushing DNA to it's wits end and have scientists racking their brain thinking about the connections one gene has with another. Proteins on the other hand haven't been pushed anywhere near as hard and are the workers of everything in our body.

DNA is virtually useless, it can't work, it has no energy to do so, it's just a book. Proteins are the workers, encoded workers with blueprints to the prize that is the Human Body. If you crack them, you crack the engineering of the Human body.

Proteins will become known more and more as time progresses and won't just be thought of as what you intake when you eat beef.


Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Inquiry confirms CIA had secret jails in Lithuania

Undercut crime: Israel admits illegal organ harvesting



According to Norway and a few reporters, there is still harvesting going on.

The Importance of Economic Equality

The Importance of Economic Equality

Higher Incomes, Less Happiness

Higher Incomes, Less Happiness

A recently released study by the CDC reveals that people who live in sunny, warm states—Hawaii, Florida, Louisiana, Tennessee, and Arizona are the top 5—report the highest levels of satisfaction in their lives. But what I find most interesting is what's going on at the bottom of the list: The states with the least happy people tend to be the ones with the highest median incomes.

Check out the happiness rankings. Here's a snippet from the bottom of the list, which includes the District of Columbia (hence there are 51 entries rather than 50), and which ranks New York dead last:

39. Nevada
40. Maryland
41. Pennsylvania
42. Rhode Island
43. Ohio
44. Massachusetts
45. Illinois
46. California
47. New Jersey
48. Indiana
49. Michigan
50. Connecticut
51. New York

Most people think of a lot of these states as very well-to-do, and they are. According to the Census, the median income throughout the U.S. was $52,175 in 2008. Nine of the bottom 13 states have a higher median income than the U.S. as a whole; of those 13, only the hard-hit industrial states Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania are below the national median. Perhaps most interestingly, the three richest states—Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey, all with median incomes above $68K—are all on the "less happy" end of the scale.

There are holes in any theory on happiness: California (#46), for instance, is an obvious sunny-and-warm state where people aren't all that happy, apparently. If sunshine was a prime factor in happiness, you'd think that Washington, Maine, and Alaska would be way down on the list, but they're not (#36, #10, and #12, respectively). And just because people make decent money, it doesn't mean they're unhappy: Hawaii (#2) boasts one of the highest median incomes ($66K). It's all relative to the cost of living, of course, and other factors—like traffic.

An AP story that sums up the rankings quotes one of the academics that poured over the data. Was he surprised that New York and California, where it seems like everyone says they want to live, were among the least happy states?

"I am only a little surprised," he said. "Many people think these states would be marvelous places to live in. The problem is that if too many individuals think that way, they move into those states, and the resulting congestion and house prices make it a non-fulfilling prophecy… We wanted to study whether people's feelings of satisfaction with their own lives are reliable, that is, whether they match up to reality — of sunshine hours, congestion, air quality, etceteras — in their own state. And they do match."

In other words, too many people can ruin a good thing.

Also, much in the way that you shouldn't assume that homeowners are happier than renters (they're not), you shouldn't assume that people living in high-income areas are happier (they're obviously not). Part of the problem is that some people move to these areas in order to feel rich and successful—like they've "made it"—and yet everywhere they look, there's someone who is richer and more successful than they are.

As a wise man once said, "Mo Money Mo Problems."

Source

The state-by-state list (including Washington, D.C.), from happiest to least cheery:

1. Louisiana
2. Hawaii
3. Florida
4. Tennessee
5. Arizona
6. South Carolina
7. Mississippi
8. Montana
9. Alabama
10. Maine
11. Wyoming
12. Alaska
13. North Carolina
14. South Dakota
15. Texas
16. Idaho
17. Vermont
18. Arkansas
19. Georgia
20. Utah
21. Oklahoma
22. Delaware
23. Colorado
24. New Mexico
25. North Dakota
26. Minnesota
27. Virginia
28. New Hampshire
29. Wisconsin
30. Oregon
31. Iowa
32. Kansas
33. Nebraska
34. West Virginia
35. Kentucky
36. Washington
37. District of Columbia
38. Missouri
39. Nevada
40. Maryland
41. Pennsylvania
42. Rhode Island
43. Ohio
44. Massachusetts
45. Illinois
46. California
47. New Jersey
48. Indiana
49. Michigan
50. Connecticut
51. New York

Source

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Commentary

Money is not wealth and even wealth does not create happiness. Louisiana, one of the poorest states in the U.S, is number 1. My friend who came back from there speaks of it like heaven and only came back to California because he could not sustain his living and find a solid job.

He says to me often that if he could get job security he would probably move back in a heart beat. What does Louisiana do that other states might not? It restricts modernization and the destruction of natural resources regardless of the economic costs involved.

That means less wealth for it's people in the long run. Does that make them less happy? Apparently it does the exact opposite.

Nature > Wealth ---- something we all should agree on.

~~~~~~

BTW i don't think this story has anything to do with size of the states, as I've bolded the biggest states on the list and they are all popular places to live, yet are widely dispersed.

This index or list probably is most affected by materialism, the most materialistic states to the least. Just a guess, would need more data to make that a solid conclusion.

Inside Story - Corruption and Politics in Pakistan - 21 Dec 09



Corruption is an everyday policy at Pakistan. If you want a $200,000 dollar road job done, you pay double. If you pay what it should cost, you get half the work done, and a poor quality road.

Kickbacks are everywhere and are a part of doing business. Corruption is open in any airport you go to where people will be asked for bribes or not allowed to board planes.

Pakistan will not modernize an inch if this corruption does not end now.