Israel PM defiant over Obama border proposals
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu rejects pre-1967 border agreement call
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected US President Barack Obama's call for peace with the Palestinians based on pre-1967 borders.
After tense talks at the White House, a defiant Mr Netanyahu said Israel was prepared to compromise but there could be no peace "based on illusions".
Mr Obama, who formally adopted the principle on Thursday, admitted there were "differences" between the views.
But he said such differences were possible "between friends".
In his speech to the state department on Thursday, Mr Obama stated overtly for the first time that the peace talks should be based on a future Palestinian state within the borders in place before the 1967 Middle East War.
"The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognised borders are established for both states," he said.
This proposal has been a key demand of the Palestinians in the negotiations.
But speaking in the Oval Office after their meeting, Mr Netanyahu flatly rejected this proposal, saying Israel wanted "a peace that will be genuine".
"We both agree that a peace based on illusions will crash eventually on the rocks of Middle Eastern reality, and that the only peace that will endure is one that is based on reality, on unshakeable facts."
'Demographic changes'Israel was "prepared to make generous compromises for peace", he said, but could not go back to the 1967 borders "because these lines are indefensible".
“Start Quote
The Israeli prime minister couldn't be clearer: At the moment there is no basis for new talks and he won't buy the president's plans”
He said the old borders did not take into account the "demographic changes that have taken place over the last 44 years".
An estimated 500,000 Israelis now live in settlements built in the Palestinian West Bank, which lies outside those borders.
The settlements are illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this.
Mr Obama said there were obviously "some differences" in the "precise formulations and language" used by Israel and the US, but that this "happens between friends".
He did not bring up the matter of the borders in his joint conference with Mr Netanyahu.
But he said Palestinians faced "tough choices" following the recent reconciliation deal between Fatah, which runs the West Bank, and Hamas, which governs Gaza and still denies Israel's right to exist.
Mr Obama said true peace could only occur if Israel was allowed to defend itself against threats.
The BBC's Paul Adams in Washington says that while notion of a peace agreement based on 1967 lines is not news, Mr Obama has clearly angered Mr Netanyahu by formally adopting it.
Mr Netanyahu has come under increasing pressure as world figures and organisations, including American's partners in the Middle East Peace Quartet, EU, UN and Russia - lined up to back Mr Obama's position.
Arab League chief, Amr Moussa, also called on President Obama to remain committed to the plan.
But in the absence of a viable peace process, it is unclear what will come of US-Israel talks, says our correspondent.
Source
~~~~~~~~~~~
Commentary
I'm glad that at least there is a clear cut position and that Israel is being confronted on all sides by this logical first step for peace.
There is no alternative at this point for any Palestinian state to exist without the 1967 borders.
Such a state would be a crippled West Bank and Gaza, a shadow of Palestine's former self. That's why such a deal is unacceptable to the Palestinian people and even to the weak boned Fatah.
At the end of the day Isreal needs to remember that it truly stole all the land it currently sits on and to be speaking as if it owns claim to it all and that it decides all the terms is very proud and very haughty.
Similar situations occurred in Northern Ireland and the violence still hasn't fully disapated after years of peace talks and unneeded deaths.
A country should never steal or usurp the land of another. Injustice will always lead to pain.
The defense of innocent people and the work of justice to reclaim land rights of those it was taken from, is now what the peace talks should focus on.
Sadly I'm not optimistic about them turning to those relevant topics.
No comments:
Post a Comment