Saturday, August 6, 2011

Auditor slams Delhi Commonwealth Games preparations

Auditor slams Delhi Commonwealth Games preparations

A crane lifts debris from a pedestrian bridge that collapsed outside the Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium (22 September 2010)
India was deeply embarrassed by the construction delays, budget overruns and corruption allegations

Related Stories

India's state auditor says preparations for last year's Commonwealth Games were deeply flawed, riddled with favouritism and vastly over budget.

A report for parliament said there were serious irregularities with bidding and contracts, and that the seven years organisers had to prepare were wasted.

The games cost $4.1bn (£2.5bn) instead of the $270m (£166m) first estimated, while revenue was only $38m (£23m).

The head of the organising committee is already in jail on corruption charges.

Law Minister Salman Khursheed said parliament would reflect on the report and "decide what needs to be done".

Suresh Kalmadi's appointment, on the recommendation of the prime minister's office despite objections from the then-sports minister, was also criticised in the auditor's report.

Due diligence 'conspicuously absent'

India's government had hoped hosting the 2010 Commonwealth Games in Delhi would showcase its status as an emerging global power, but it was instead deeply embarrassed by construction delays, budget overruns and corruption allegations.

The Comptroller and Auditor General of India's report concluded that the root of the organisers' problems were the model of governance set up in 2003, in which "authority was dissipated, accountability was defused and unity of command was not provided for or followed".

Timeline: Games scandal

  • October 2010: Games held in Delhi after weeks of problems and construction delays - corruption probe begins soon after
  • November 2010: Games Chairman Suresh Kalmadi resigns his post in the Congress party
  • November 2010: Officials TS Darbari, Sanjay Mohindroo and Games treasurer M Jayachandran arrested over alleged financial irregularities
  • January 2011: Suresh Kalmadi and Games secretary general Lalit Bhanot sacked
  • February 2011: Mr Bhanot and top official VK Verma arrested
  • March 2011: Head of India's anti-corruption watchdog forced to resign
  • April 2011: Suresh Kalmadi arrested

Huge amounts of public money were placed at the disposal of non-government officials unwilling to heed advice from civil servants.

"The modus operandi observed over the entire gamut of activities leading to the conduct of the games was: inexplicable delays in decision making, which put pressure on timelines and thereby led to the creation of an artificial or consciously created sense of urgency," the report said.

"Since the target date was immovable, such delays could only be overcome by seeking, and liberally granting, waivers laid down in government procedures."

Many contracts were awarded after single bids, while some were handed out on a "nomination basis", without any competition.

The exorbitant rates charged by contractors to counter the delays caused huge financial loss to the organising committee and the government.

At the same time, the federal and local governments failed to examine the organising committee's proposals, budgets and actions.

"Appropriate due diligence was conspicuously absent at all levels."

The report said the contract for a timing, scoring and results system was awarded to Swiss timing company, Omega SA, after a rival, MSL Spain, was disqualified irregularly. The contract for building the athletes' village was handed to Emaar MGF Constructions on the basis of a single bid.

Delhi's state government was also accused of wasting at least $29m with its "ill-conceived and ill-planned" plan to beautify the city before the games, including spending $7.7m extra on foreign-made street lighting.

This revelation led to the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to demand the immediate resignation of Delhi Chief Minister, Sheila Dikshit.

Ms Dikshit rejected the demand but said she would co-operate fully with the parliamentary committee which will investigate the audit report.

Source

No comments:

Post a Comment