My reply to the above problem was:
"Has this man ever designed a budget?
~~~~~~~~~
But the reply by MrDeathsmiles was better:
But the reply by MrDeathsmiles was better:
"Sick globalist eugenicist.Sure, Bill, you look so nice and nerdy. You give the perception that death can be a good thing. However, a society that chooses life over death for simply their own existence, is no society at all. You're part of the globalist movement to dissect and destroy moral values, all while doing it in a friendly tone with a smile on your face.
The day where we have to destroy other lives to justify our existence, is the day we lose our souls and no longer deserve life."
Well said, well said indeed.
You allocate money properly, that's understood. But you can't say one part is stealing from another part, when they're completely separate categories.
I could just as easily say the war in Iraq is stealing teachers jobs, or the President's income is stealing teaching jobs.
The problem is not end of life care, it's mis-allocations of funds."