No respite for China's human rights dissidents

The case of former university professor and human rights activist Liu Xiaobo, 53, who has spent most of the past 20 years in jail or under house arrest, reveals much about what is going on beneath the glossy surface of the new China, Quentin Sommerville explains.

Mr Liu has been a political activist for more than two decades

Liu Xiaobo's wife, Liu Xia, pulled a handkerchief from her thick winter coat and sighed.

"We are living a life basically without freedom.

"Right now Liu Xiaobo has no freedom at all, not even a tiny bit," she said, her voice cracking.

Her husband is facing up to 15 years in prison if convicted of fresh charges for "inciting subversion of the Chinese state".

He has been detained for a year this time, and she has grown thin.

Her phone calls are being monitored, she has been denied internet access, and plain-clothes policemen lurk outside her home.

Liu Xiaobo's crime was to publish a democratic manifesto, Charter 08.

It calls for freedom of expression, multi-party elections, independent courts and for the military to be answerable to the government and not the Communist Party.

More than 300 people, academics and writers, signed it.

"It's time we stopped treating words as crimes," Mrs Liu had said.

But no criticism of the Communist Party is ever ignored here, and no challenge to its absolute rule is tolerated.

Party domination

China's courts are under the total control of the party, so it is almost certain that Liu Xiaobo will be convicted.

When President Obama visited China last month, he took a soft approach to human rights.

But he did present China with a list of cases that the US was concerned about, it is thought that Mr Liu's name was on it.

But China ignored Mr Obama, and less than a month later, the state pushed ahead with its prosecution of Mr Liu.

Before, when US presidents and other world leaders visited, China would often release a dissident.

Protests are not uncommon in China

Around the time of President Bush's visit in 2005, Wang Wanxing was released from 13 years detention.

When President Clinton visited, Wang Dan, one of the Tiananmen protesters, was set free.

But now, China no longer needs to worry about what the West thinks.

It was President Clinton who said human rights should not be allowed to interfere with relations with China.

Beijing took this to heart, because if there are no adverse consequences, why bow to western pressure?

Human rights in China are supposed to be improving.

It was thought the Olympics would make things better, prosperity would make things better, and leaving China to move at its own pace would make things better.

But human rights and legal reforms are moving backwards, not forward.

China is a country ruled by law, the government likes to claim. Except, it is not.

Wang Shengjun is the chief justice, but he has never been to law school.

However, he does have excellent contacts within the Communist Party.

Ordinary people, hardly what you would call political radicals, have grown hungry for legal rights

And he has been a very loyal cadre, halting years of legal reform by telling China's judiciary to reject the concept of independent courts.

Instead they should consider Communist Party interests first, then the people's interests, and finally constitutional law.

Despite the wishes of radicals like Liu Xiaobo, since Tiananmen, there has not been much appetite here for democratic reform.

People have grown richer, and are largely content under the Communist Party's rule.

But ordinary people, hardly what you would call political radicals, have grown hungry for legal rights, and progress was made in creating an independent and professional judiciary. That has now stopped.

Lawless land

What does it mean to live in a country without law?

It means that the parents of the schoolchildren who died in the Sichuan earthquake will never get their day in court.

It means that people poisoned by China's filthy factories have never been able to sue.

That farmers robbed of their land by corrupted officials are left destitute.

Will President Obama have any future influence with China's leaders?

And it means living in fear, which drives people to desperation.

In Chengdu, Sichuan, 47-year-old Tang Fuzhen tried to stop the local government from demolishing her home.

But the bulldozers and demolition crews arrived early one morning.

She could take no more, so she covered herself in petrol and set herself alight. She later died in hospital.

Eight of her family members, including her husband and son were then detained for "disrupting government work".

Across China, those who are frustrated by corruption or injustice are taking to the streets.

They did so on the island of Xiamen to stop a chemical plant being built near their homes; in Shanghai it was the threat of a new railway line; in Guangdong, to protest a planned waste incinerator.

And in each case it was the middle class, the newly rich, those who had benefited from the party's rule, who took to the streets.

With no faith in the courts, they had little choice but to take direct action.

As I was leaving her, Liu Xia turned and said: "It's written in our constitution that freedom of speech is a right of people.

"But Liu Xiaobo said a few words, and now he's a criminal. So you tell me, who is this Chinese Constitution written for? I do not know."

Source

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Commentary

This is what most people have been missing about China. This isn't drastically radical news that was just released or that no one has heard about til now, and yet for some reason the majority of America still feels China is this strong industrialized giant that serves it's people.

It's honestly none of the above. Economically if you look at the spending power and economic output of Chinese people per capita, it's a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of an American. They're missing the strong consuming power we have, that drives the economy at full force and that we often take for granted.

It's people are served somewhat well but only at the very basic levels and there are few reasons and few possibilities to make more of yourself. The potential is missing often even when you do want to get financing for your new business or go to a University.

It's why I feel Russia, not China, is the future leader(2030-40), IF Russia lets the private sector do it's thing without interfering using dirty politics. Right now the markets and officials are being too corrupt to allow Russia to truly flourish but it's much more free in many ways than China and their consumption levels are a lot higher per capita.

We all can agree America is too indebted to lead. It can pull it's political purse strings for maybe another decade but after that it's at-least two more decades of hard work to pay off our debt. It took Canada a decade to pay off it's debt and it was nowhere near as big as ours; granted they also don't have as much revenue as we do.

Emerging economies is harder to pick but here are some key figures:

• 1)Brazil
• 2) Venezuala
• 3) Angola
• 4) Malaysia
• 5) Thailand

India and China have too much work ahead of them to truly Emerge strongly in the next couple decades. After that though you should see them as the giants of the world, possibly how America looks now compared to how it was in the early 1900's. As I said before, look for Russia to be the leader in the 2050 ranges if they play their cards right.

We can join China and India at the top, later in the century, if we work towards greater Democracy and Publicly funded elections. Democracy cures most ailments that can be cured when it comes to corruption, injustice, and human rights.